EU · binding regulation
EU AI Act
EU-AIA-2024
Treatment of Foundation Models / GPAI
governsArts. 51-55 (general-purpose AI + systemic risk)
Primary source: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
Comparative jurisdictional memo · Foundation Models / GPAI
EU-AIA-2024 — coverage across 24 topics
Color = verdict, height = confidence. One tick per topic.
CN-GENAI-2023 — coverage across 24 topics
Color = verdict, height = confidence. One tick per topic.
EU · binding regulation
EU-AIA-2024
Treatment of Foundation Models / GPAI
governsArts. 51-55 (general-purpose AI + systemic risk)
Primary source: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
CN · binding regulation
CN-GENAI-2023
Treatment of Foundation Models / GPAI
governsArt. 2 (applies to GenAI services regardless of size)
Primary source: CAC Order No. 15
15 of 24 topics differ; 9 agree.
On the topic of Foundation Models / GPAI, EU AI Act is classified as governs and Interim Measures for Generative AI Service Management as governs. The editorial verdict is converges. The two regimes take the same position; this is a candidate for cross-jurisdictional alignment in industry guidance, voluntary codes, and harmonisation tracks.
Contested question: Does the foundation-model category map to a coherent capability tier, or is it a regulatory convenience? Compute-threshold vs behavioural-threshold debate is unresolved across EU/US/China.