EU · binding regulation
EU AI Act
EU-AIA-2024
Treatment of Compute + Model-Weight Export Controls
silentEU AIA does not address compute / weight export controls; lives in dual-use Regulation (EU) 2021/821
Primary source: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
Comparative jurisdictional memo · Compute + Model-Weight Export Controls
EU-AIA-2024 — coverage across 24 topics
Color = verdict, height = confidence. One tick per topic.
UK-WHITEPAPER-2023 — coverage across 24 topics
Color = verdict, height = confidence. One tick per topic.
EU · binding regulation
EU-AIA-2024
Treatment of Compute + Model-Weight Export Controls
silentEU AIA does not address compute / weight export controls; lives in dual-use Regulation (EU) 2021/821
Primary source: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
UK · policy statement
UK-WHITEPAPER-2023
Treatment of Compute + Model-Weight Export Controls
silentPrinciple-based; export controls lives in DBT / NCSC export-licensing regime
Primary source: CP 815 (2023)
17 of 24 topics differ; 7 agree.
On the topic of Compute + Model-Weight Export Controls, EU AI Act is classified as silent and UK Pro-Innovation Approach to AI Regulation (White Paper) as silent. The editorial verdict is both silent. Neither instrument addresses this topic. This is a policy lacuna — there is no incumbent canonical position from either regime, so future regulator activity on this topic shapes the entire field.
Contested question: Should compute + weight export controls govern by (a) recipient jurisdiction, (b) capability tier of the controlled artifact, or (c) end-use intent? Each rule generation has shifted between these frames.