EU · binding regulation
EU AI Act
EU-AIA-2024
Treatment of Sovereign AI Doctrine
silentNo explicit sovereign-AI doctrine
Primary source: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
Comparative jurisdictional memo · Sovereign AI Doctrine
EU-AIA-2024 — coverage across 24 topics
Color = verdict, height = confidence. One tick per topic.
US-EO-14110 — coverage across 24 topics
Color = verdict, height = confidence. One tick per topic.
EU · binding regulation
EU-AIA-2024
Treatment of Sovereign AI Doctrine
silentNo explicit sovereign-AI doctrine
Primary source: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
US · executive order
US-EO-14110
Treatment of Sovereign AI Doctrine
governs§4.2 (Commerce reporting on dual-use models + large compute clusters; IaaS rules)
Primary source: Exec. Order No. 14110, 88 Fed. Reg. 75191 (Nov. 1, 2023)
14 of 24 topics differ; 10 agree.
On the topic of Sovereign AI Doctrine, EU AI Act is classified as silent and Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI as governs. The editorial verdict is asymmetric. One regime addresses the topic explicitly while the other covers it only implicitly or not at all; this is a likely site of regulatory arbitrage and a candidate for comparative-law follow-up.
Contested question: Is jurisdiction-bound model deployment technically feasible at frontier scale? Field literature is sparse; doctrine is post-2023 and largely aspirational.