{"$schema":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/external-conformance.json","name":"Policy Window PRISMA-ScR external-conformance scorecard","description":"Deterministic per-article conformance to the FULL authoritative PRISMA-ScR checklist (Tricco et al. 2018, 22 reporting items) — the independent external yardstick, not Policy Window's own rubric. N/A items (no registered protocol; no flow diagram — a living evidence map) are reported with reasons and excluded from the denominator, never counted as met. Re-derivable from the published catalog.","checklist":{"name":"PRISMA-ScR (Tricco et al. 2018, Ann Intern Med 169(7):467-473) — 22 reporting items","citation":"Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467-473.","url":"https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850","items":22},"docs":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/external-conformance","relatedScorecards":{"internalRubric":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/editorial-standards.json","citationIntegrity":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/verification.json"},"summary":{"total":110,"meanConformance":0.9762,"byItem":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","reportedRate":1,"partialRate":0,"naRate":0},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","reportedRate":1,"partialRate":0,"naRate":0},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","reportedRate":1,"partialRate":0,"naRate":0},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","reportedRate":1,"partialRate":0,"naRate":0},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","reportedRate":0,"partialRate":0,"naRate":1},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","reportedRate":1,"partialRate":0,"naRate":0},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","reportedRate":1,"partialRate":0,"naRate":0},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","reportedRate":1,"partialRate":0,"naRate":0},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","reportedRate":1,"partialRate":0,"naRate":0},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","reportedRate":1,"partialRate":0,"naRate":0},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","reportedRate":1,"partialRate":0,"naRate":0},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","reportedRate":1,"partialRate":0,"naRate":0},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","reportedRate":1,"partialRate":0,"naRate":0},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","reportedRate":0,"partialRate":1,"naRate":0},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","reportedRate":1,"partialRate":0,"naRate":0},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","reportedRate":1,"partialRate":0,"naRate":0},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","reportedRate":1,"partialRate":0,"naRate":0},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","reportedRate":1,"partialRate":0,"naRate":0},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","reportedRate":1,"partialRate":0,"naRate":0},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","reportedRate":1,"partialRate":0,"naRate":0},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","reportedRate":1,"partialRate":0,"naRate":0},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","reportedRate":1,"partialRate":0,"naRate":0}]},"articles":[{"kind":"instrument","slug":"eu-ai-act","title":"EU AI Act","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/eu-ai-act","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (243); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"us-eo-14110","title":"Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/us-eo-14110","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (238); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"us-eo-14179","title":"Executive Order 14179 — Removing Barriers to American Leadership in AI","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/us-eo-14179","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (99); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"uk-ai-white-paper","title":"UK Pro-Innovation Approach to AI Regulation (White Paper)","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/uk-ai-white-paper","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (152); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"china-genai-measures","title":"Interim Measures for Generative AI Service Management","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/china-genai-measures","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (157); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"g7-hiroshima-code","title":"G7 Hiroshima AI Process Code of Conduct","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/g7-hiroshima-code","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (125); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"oecd-ai-principles","title":"OECD AI Principles (Recommendation)","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/oecd-ai-principles","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (115); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"coe-ai-convention","title":"Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/coe-ai-convention","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (177); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"un-ai-resolution-2024","title":"UN GA Resolution on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/un-ai-resolution-2024","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (140); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"nist-ai-rmf","title":"NIST AI Risk Management Framework","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/nist-ai-rmf","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (126); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"bletchley-declaration","title":"Bletchley Declaration on AI Safety","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/bletchley-declaration","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (100); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"seoul-declaration","title":"Seoul Declaration on Safe, Innovative and Inclusive AI","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/seoul-declaration","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (111); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"nist-ai-rmf-genai-profile","title":"NIST AI RMF Generative AI Profile","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/nist-ai-rmf-genai-profile","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (139); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"ca-sb-1047","title":"California SB-1047: Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier AI Models Act","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/ca-sb-1047","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (102); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"india-dpdpa","title":"India Digital Personal Data Protection Act + AI Advisory (MEITY)","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/india-dpdpa","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (130); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"brazil-ai-bill","title":"Brazil AI Bill (PL 2338/2023)","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/brazil-ai-bill","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (143); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"asean-ai-guide","title":"ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/asean-ai-guide","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (108); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"au-continental-ai-strategy","title":"African Union Continental AI Strategy","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/au-continental-ai-strategy","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (104); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"anthropic-rsp","title":"Anthropic Responsible Scaling Policy (RSP) v2","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/anthropic-rsp","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (129); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"openai-preparedness","title":"OpenAI Preparedness Framework","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/openai-preparedness","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (111); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"deepmind-fsf","title":"Google DeepMind Frontier Safety Framework","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/deepmind-fsf","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (105); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"meta-frontier-ai-framework","title":"Meta Frontier AI Framework","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/meta-frontier-ai-framework","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (122); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"uk-us-aisi-mou","title":"UK-US AI Safety Institute Memorandum of Understanding","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/uk-us-aisi-mou","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (85); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"wh-voluntary-2023","title":"White House Voluntary AI Commitments","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/wh-voluntary-2023","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (113); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"singapore-model-ai-governance","title":"Singapore Model AI Governance Framework for Generative AI","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/singapore-model-ai-governance","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (109); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"japan-meti-ai-guidelines","title":"Japan METI AI Guidelines for Business","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/japan-meti-ai-guidelines","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (109); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"gdpr","title":"General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/gdpr","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (70); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"gpai-code-of-practice","title":"EU General-Purpose AI Code of Practice","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/gpai-code-of-practice","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (93); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"omb-m-24-10","title":"OMB Memorandum M-24-10 (Advancing Governance, Innovation, and Risk Management for Agency Use of AI)","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/omb-m-24-10","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (105); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"gsa-ai-acquisition-guide","title":"GSA Generative AI and Specialized Computing Infrastructure Acquisition Resource Guide","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/gsa-ai-acquisition-guide","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (104); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"dod-rai-strategy","title":"DoD Responsible AI Strategy and Implementation Pathway","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/dod-rai-strategy","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (105); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"fedramp-ai-guidance","title":"FedRAMP AI Cloud Procurement Guidance","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/fedramp-ai-guidance","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (104); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"dfars-252-204","title":"DFARS Subpart 252.204 (Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting)","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/dfars-252-204","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (83); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"ca-sb-53","title":"California SB-53: Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act (TFAIA)","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/ca-sb-53","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (110); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"ca-sb-243","title":"California SB 243: Companion Chatbots","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/ca-sb-243","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (49); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"ca-sb-942","title":"California SB 942: AI Transparency Act","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/ca-sb-942","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (90); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"eu-product-liability-directive","title":"Revised Product Liability Directive (Directive (EU) 2024/2853)","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/eu-product-liability-directive","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (48); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"unesco-ai-ethics-recommendation","title":"UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/unesco-ai-ethics-recommendation","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (170); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"eu-platform-work-directive","title":"Directive (EU) 2024/2831 on improving working conditions in platform work","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/eu-platform-work-directive","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (74); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"china-deep-synthesis-provisions","title":"Provisions on the Administration of Deep Synthesis of Internet Information Services","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/china-deep-synthesis-provisions","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (106); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"ny-raise-act","title":"New York RAISE Act: Responsible AI Safety and Education Act","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/ny-raise-act","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (91); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"take-it-down-act","title":"TAKE IT DOWN Act (Tools to Address Known Exploitation by Immobilizing Technological Deepfakes on Websites and Networks Act)","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/take-it-down-act","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (32); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"italy-ai-law-2025","title":"Italy Law No. 132/2025 on Artificial Intelligence (Legge 23 settembre 2025, n. 132)","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/italy-ai-law-2025","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (198); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"japan-ai-promotion-act","title":"Japan AI Promotion Act (Act on the Promotion of Research, Development and Utilization of AI-Related Technologies)","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/japan-ai-promotion-act","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (152); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"instrument","slug":"un-global-digital-compact","title":"UN Global Digital Compact","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/un-global-digital-compact","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (166); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"foundation-models","title":"Foundation Models / GPAI","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/foundation-models","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (40); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"biometric-id","title":"Biometric Identification","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/biometric-id","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (13); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"deepfakes","title":"Deepfakes / Synthetic Content","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/deepfakes","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (16); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"employment","title":"AI in Employment","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/employment","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (13); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"healthcare","title":"AI in Healthcare","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/healthcare","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (13); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"criminal-justice","title":"AI in Criminal Justice","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/criminal-justice","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (15); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"education","title":"AI in Education","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/education","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (10); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"compute-reporting","title":"Compute-Threshold Reporting","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/compute-reporting","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (25); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"transparency","title":"Transparency Obligations","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/transparency","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (27); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"redress","title":"Individual Redress","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/redress","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (16); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"training-data","title":"Training-Data Rights","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/training-data","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (27); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"sovereign-ai","title":"Sovereign AI Doctrine","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/sovereign-ai","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (12); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"catastrophic-risk","title":"Catastrophic & Existential Risk","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/catastrophic-risk","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (18); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"tech-sovereignty","title":"Technological Sovereignty","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/tech-sovereignty","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (12); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"development-rights-framing","title":"Development-Rights Framings","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/development-rights-framing","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (21); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"international-coordination","title":"International Coordination","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/international-coordination","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (10); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"agentic-systems-governance","title":"Agentic AI Governance","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/agentic-systems-governance","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (11); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"open-weight-release","title":"Open-Weight Frontier Release","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/open-weight-release","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (11); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"synthetic-content-provenance","title":"Synthetic Content Provenance","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/synthetic-content-provenance","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (10); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"compute-export-controls","title":"Compute + Model-Weight Export Controls","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/compute-export-controls","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (9); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"environmental-impact-of-training","title":"Environmental Impact of AI Training","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/environmental-impact-of-training","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (13); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"national-security-carveouts","title":"National Security Carveouts in AI Regulation","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/national-security-carveouts","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (14); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"topic","slug":"ai-worker-displacement","title":"AI-Driven Worker Displacement","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/ai-worker-displacement","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (19); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"frontier-tier","title":"Frontier-Tier AI","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/frontier-tier","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (56); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"asl-3","title":"AI Safety Level 3 (ASL-3)","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/asl-3","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (56); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"systemic-risk","title":"Systemic Risk (AI)","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/systemic-risk","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (68); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"designated-systemic","title":"Designated Systemic-Risk Model","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/designated-systemic","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (70); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"compute-threshold","title":"Compute Threshold (AI Governance)","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/compute-threshold","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (65); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"red-team-evaluation","title":"Red-Team Evaluation","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/red-team-evaluation","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (70); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"model-card","title":"Model Card","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/model-card","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (64); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"alignment","title":"AI Alignment","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/alignment","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (70); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"deceptive-alignment","title":"Deceptive Alignment","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/deceptive-alignment","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (56); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"mesa-optimization","title":"Mesa-Optimization","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/mesa-optimization","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (56); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"scalable-oversight","title":"Scalable Oversight","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/scalable-oversight","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (64); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"capability-elicitation","title":"Capability Elicitation","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/capability-elicitation","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (70); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"dual-use-research-taxonomy","title":"Dual-Use Research Norms (DURC for AI)","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/dual-use-research-taxonomy","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (71); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"provenance-watermarking","title":"Provenance & Watermarking","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/provenance-watermarking","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (62); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"policy-instrument","title":"Policy Instrument","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/policy-instrument","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (79); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"ai-supply-chain","title":"AI Supply Chain","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/ai-supply-chain","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (78); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"training-data-attribution","title":"Training-Data Attribution","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/training-data-attribution","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (58); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"prompt-injection","title":"Prompt Injection","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/prompt-injection","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (54); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"agentic-system","title":"Agentic AI System","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/agentic-system","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (66); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"tool-use-safety","title":"Tool-Use Safety","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/tool-use-safety","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (52); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"multi-turn-evaluation","title":"Multi-Turn Evaluation","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/multi-turn-evaluation","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (70); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"data-poisoning","title":"Data Poisoning","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/data-poisoning","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (71); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"model-distillation-risk","title":"Model Distillation Risk","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/model-distillation-risk","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (65); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"jailbreak-resistance","title":"Jailbreak Resistance","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/jailbreak-resistance","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (66); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"model-merging-risk","title":"Model-Merging Risk","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/model-merging-risk","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (60); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"inference-time-compute","title":"Inference-Time Compute","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/inference-time-compute","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (67); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"sandbagging","title":"Sandbagging","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/sandbagging","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (56); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"hallucination","title":"Hallucination","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/hallucination","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (76); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"in-context-learning","title":"In-Context Learning","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/in-context-learning","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (70); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"retrieval-augmented-generation","title":"Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/retrieval-augmented-generation","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (81); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"chain-of-thought-monitoring","title":"Chain-of-Thought Monitoring","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/chain-of-thought-monitoring","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (62); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"concept","slug":"hardware-enabled-governance","title":"Hardware-Enabled Governance Mechanisms","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/hardware-enabled-governance","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (42); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Two-silences synthesis (problem-reality + governance-efficacy, epistemic-status-labelled)"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"benchmark","slug":"swe-bench-verified","title":"SWE-bench Verified","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/swe-bench-verified","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (50); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"benchmark","slug":"mmlu","title":"MMLU","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/mmlu","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (40); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"benchmark","slug":"mmlu-pro","title":"MMLU-Pro","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/mmlu-pro","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (40); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"benchmark","slug":"gpqa-diamond","title":"GPQA Diamond","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/gpqa-diamond","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (40); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"benchmark","slug":"arc-agi-v2","title":"ARC-AGI v2","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/arc-agi-v2","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (40); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"benchmark","slug":"humaneval","title":"HumanEval","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/humaneval","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (40); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"benchmark","slug":"math-benchmark","title":"MATH (Hendrycks)","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/math-benchmark","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (40); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"benchmark","slug":"aime-2024","title":"AIME 2024","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/aime-2024","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (40); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"benchmark","slug":"humanitys-last-exam","title":"Humanity's Last Exam","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/humanitys-last-exam","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (40); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]},{"kind":"benchmark","slug":"frontiermath","title":"FrontierMath","url":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/frontiermath","conformance":0.9762,"reported":20,"partial":1,"na":1,"items":[{"num":1,"section":"Title","name":"Identify the report as a scoping review","status":"reported","detail":"Carried in each article's schema.org `genre` (machine-readable) + the /wiki/methodology page; the human-facing title kicker was dropped for reading parsimony"},{"num":2,"section":"Abstract","name":"Structured summary","status":"reported","detail":"At-a-glance infobox + lede surface the key facts"},{"num":3,"section":"Introduction","name":"Rationale","status":"reported","detail":"Definition + scope establish why the review matters"},{"num":4,"section":"Introduction","name":"Objectives","status":"reported","detail":"Review question stated per article (Review methods box)"},{"num":5,"section":"Methods","name":"Protocol and registration","status":"na","detail":"No registered protocol — a living, continuously-updated evidence map; disclosed in the Review methods box rather than omitted"},{"num":6,"section":"Methods","name":"Eligibility criteria","status":"reported","detail":"Inclusion + exclusion criteria stated (Review methods box)"},{"num":7,"section":"Methods","name":"Information sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source base disclosed (primary legal/standards + academic + institutional)"},{"num":8,"section":"Methods","name":"Search","status":"reported","detail":"Search & selection method disclosed (regulator monitoring + arXiv/Crossref seed+snowball, refreshed to the review date)"},{"num":9,"section":"Methods","name":"Selection of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Screening for relevance + verifiability disclosed in Search & selection"},{"num":10,"section":"Methods","name":"Data charting process","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method + the typed catalog charting schema (single-curator, pin-validated)"},{"num":11,"section":"Methods","name":"Data items","status":"reported","detail":"Charted variables = the catalog cell fields (verdict, provision, excerpt, source type/authority)"},{"num":12,"section":"Methods","name":"Critical appraisal of individual sources","status":"reported","detail":"Source-type authority appraisal (structured editorial classification, not risk-of-bias; disclosed as such)"},{"num":13,"section":"Methods","name":"Synthesis of results (methods)","status":"reported","detail":"Synthesis method stated per kind (Review methods box)"},{"num":14,"section":"Results","name":"Selection of sources of evidence (results)","status":"partial","detail":"Included-source count is shown (40); no identified→screened→excluded PRISMA flow diagram is maintained (disclosed)"},{"num":15,"section":"Results","name":"Characteristics of sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Source-appraisal table charts the base by source type + authority tier"},{"num":16,"section":"Results","name":"Critical appraisal within sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-type appraisal rendered inline (source-appraisal table)"},{"num":17,"section":"Results","name":"Results of individual sources of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Per-source one-line findings with primary links (AI summaries labelled ✦)"},{"num":18,"section":"Results","name":"Synthesis of results","status":"reported","detail":"Narrative synthesis over the cited base"},{"num":19,"section":"Discussion","name":"Summary of evidence","status":"reported","detail":"Scope + so-what summarise the evidence and the named silences"},{"num":20,"section":"Discussion","name":"Limitations","status":"reported","detail":"Limitations stated (coverage asymmetries; AI prose labelled where present; not externally peer-reviewed)"},{"num":21,"section":"Discussion","name":"Conclusions","status":"reported","detail":"Verdicts + locus-of-dispute give the article's conclusions"},{"num":22,"section":"Funding","name":"Funding","status":"reported","detail":"Funding & competing-interests line (Review methods box)"}]}],"license":"CC BY 4.0","attribution":"Policy Window — policywindow.org"}